This week's wisdom comes courtesy of two rather different sources. The first is recently unearthed memo to the writers of the TV show The Unit, from its creator and executive producer, David Mamet. There's a ton of practical wisdom here, and you should definitely check it out yourself, but here are some highlights:
QUESTION:WHAT IS DRAMA? DRAMA, AGAIN, IS THE QUEST OF THE HERO TO OVERCOME THOSE THINGS WHICH PREVENT HIM FROM ACHIEVING A SPECIFIC, ACUTE GOAL.
SO: WE, THE WRITERS, MUST ASK OURSELVES OF EVERY SCENE THESE THREE QUESTIONS.
1) WHO WANTS WHAT?
2) WHAT HAPPENS IF HER DON’T GET IT?
3) WHY NOW?
And, similarly:
THE JOB OF THE DRAMATIST IS TO MAKE THE AUDIENCE WONDER WHAT HAPPENS NEXT. NOT TO EXPLAIN TO THEM WHAT JUST HAPPENED, OR TO*SUGGEST* TO THEM WHAT HAPPENS NEXT.
ANY DICKHEAD, AS ABOVE, CAN WRITE, “BUT, JIM, IF WE DON’T ASSASSINATE THE PRIME MINISTER IN THE NEXT SCENE, ALL EUROPE WILL BE ENGULFED IN FLAME”
Obviously this is aimed at TV writers, but the lesson in dramatic writing and scene construction can be cross-applied to those writing novels and short stories as well. And so we thank you, David Mamet, for writing in ALL CAPITALS about these lessons that we definitely need to learn.
Our second piece of advice comes from Carson at Script Shadow, another one of my favorite sites. This week was "alternate draft week" over there, where Carson compares and contrasts (and whenever possible, posts links to) alternate drafts of well-known screenplays. Yesterday he posted a review of an early, alternate version of The Empire Strikes Back by Leigh Brackett.

Brackett is a Hollywood legend, having written The Big Sleep with William Faulkner and Rio Bravo for Howard Hawks, among many others, and she was working on Empire for George Lucas when she died. I haven't had a chance to read Brackett's draft yet, but Carson gives us a pretty good synopsis of how it differs from Lawrence Kasdan's finished and produced revision, and along the way he has some pretty insightful things to say about how the final version works better.
Carson?
"Comparing these two drafts, in the Brackett Draft, we meet Vader hanging out on his throne, waiting for information. Compare that to the film, where he’s in his Star Destroyer, gung-ho searching the galaxy to find Luke. Which is more interesting? Or let’s look at the rule on a much smaller scale. In Brackett’s draft, when we meet Han, he’s sort of rummaging around the base, running into people and occasionally talking to them. Compare that to the film, where he’s desperately trying to get his ship fixed so he can get the hell out of here! Which one is more interesting? At the beginning of every scene, take every character and ask yourself, “What are they doing right now? What is their goal in this scene?” You do that and you’ll have a bunch of interesting characters engaging in an interesting scene. You don’t, and you’ll have a bunch of characters standing around doing nothing, waiting for their turn to talk. Which one is more interesting?"
Now, just as a hypothetical, say you happen to be in the middle of rewriting a Star Wars novel with a compelling antagonist...could you ask for a more penetrating diagnosis of how to go about the job?



